Flat fees from £5k per month - One retainer, all five fibres.

The UK Franchise Growth Index

Business over Breakfast

Business Consultancy, Services and Support · Consultancy · Business Consultancy

The franchise opportunity associated with this entry is Business for Breakfast, usually branded BforB. Published franchise coverage dates its foundation in the UK to 2001. It operates a business networking and referral marketing model, bringing businesses together through structured meetings, events and training intended to help members develop professional relationships and qualified introductions.

Read more about Business over Breakfast

Overall Five Fibre score
25/100
Assessment
Independent
Last reviewed
Data confidence
Medium

The Five Fibre score measures this network against Twine Growth's Five Fibre Framework™ using the information available at the assessment date. It is not an endorsement, a financial recommendation or a recommendation to purchase a franchise.

About the network

More about Business over Breakfast.

BforB describes its groups as communities whose members learn about one another's businesses and become advocates for their services. Its published ground rules expect members to contribute referrals and introductions, invite guests and attend meetings or send a representative. The model therefore depends on active participation and continuing relationships, rather than simply placing businesses in a directory.

The official guest information states that members receive sector exclusivity within their group, so competing businesses are not seeking the same referrals in that meeting. Each group has its own mix of local members. Networking and referral training support the process of understanding other businesses and recognising relevant opportunities, but the resulting introductions should not be interpreted as a guaranteed level of sales.

The official franchise page describes several levels of participation. Individual franchisees develop an area with a proposed five or ten clubs, while county licensees and regional master licensees oversee larger structures involving franchisees. The advertised numbers describe the scope of these packages, rather than proving that every territory already contains that many operating clubs. The organisation says new operators receive support and training during the early stages of building their networking businesses.

The opportunity places emphasis on leadership, communication, initiative, accountability and commercial focus. Recruiting and supporting members and sustaining effective clubs are central to the advertised role. Current contractual charges and territory availability require a direct proposal. The name Business over Breakfast is also used by a separate networking group at businessoverbreakfast.co.uk; the franchise arrangements described here relate specifically to BforB, as identified by the franchise opportunity link associated with this entry.

At a glance

Business over Breakfast at a glance.

Industry
Business Consultancy, Services and Support
Franchise category
Consultancy
Sub industry
Business Consultancy
Founded
2001
BFA member
No
UK origin
Yes
International brand
Yes
Recruitment status
Active

Investment

Franchise investment.

Home based
Yes
Executive franchise
Yes
Master franchise available
Yes

View franchise opportunity

Investment figures change. Confirm current requirements directly with the franchise network before making any decision.

Five Fibre assessment

How the foundations score.

Every franchise network is assessed across the five connected areas Twine Growth believes support sustainable franchise growth.

How the Five Fibre score is calculated

01 Assess Weak Foundation8/20

Assess: The row has a material identity problem. Historical BoB Clubs activity is evidenced, but current sources describe its conclusion and newer related organisations. BforB is a separate business and its current opportunity cannot substantiate this record.

  • Profitable core business: Partially, 2.5/5. Historical clubs and membership operation show the former concept was implemented. Current profitable operation of the original franchisor model was not verified after closure and dissolution evidence.
  • Operates without daily founder input: Partially, 2.5/5. Historical regional operators show some transfer beyond the founder. Present continuity of the original central organisation and its ability to operate without daily founder input were not established.
  • Ideal owner defined: Partially, 1.5/3. Historical licence and group leadership roles offer some profile evidence. A current original-network candidate specification was not verified, and BforB criteria are excluded.
  • Realistic owner earnings: No public verification, 0/4. No current representative owner earnings or applicable original-network commercial terms were verified. New BoB Connections membership and licence claims cannot fill that gap.
  • Distinct proposition: Partially, 1.5/3. The historical fortnightly referral format and category exclusivity provide a recognisable proposition. Current availability of the original opportunity was not established.
02 Build Weak Foundation8.5/20

Build: Historical meeting and portal methods receive limited recognition. Current contractual continuity, manuals, training and delivery rights under the original Business over Breakfast network were not established.

  • Documented operating playbook: Partially, 2.5/5. Historical meeting structure and member portal descriptions show documented components. A current maintained original-network operational playbook was not verified.
  • Structured onboarding: Partially, 2/4. The historical model was transferred to local operators, supporting some training capability. A current original-network induction and continuing delivery team were not established.
  • Documented brand experience: Partially, 2/4. Historical structured meetings and category rules describe a repeatable experience. Current enforceable brand standards under the original franchisor were not verified.
  • Central resource access: No public verification, 0/3. No current original-network owner destination for maintained manuals, training, tools and templates was verified. A former member portal and the newer organisation’s site are not equivalent evidence.
  • Launch without constant founder input: Partially, 2/4. Historical local club operation suggests a transferable format. Current original-network opening support and accountable team were not established.
03 Launch Critical Gap0/20

Launch: No current original-network ownership proposition or direct applicant process was verified. Current BoB Connections recruitment belongs to a newer legal entity and must not be silently substituted.

  • Clear ownership proposition: No public verification, 0/5. No current original-network ownership proposition was verified. The workbook’s BforB link concerns Business for Breakfast, a separate brand.
  • Targeted recruitment messaging: No public verification, 0/4. No current recruitment messaging for the original network was established. BoB Connections invites operators, but its newer entity is not silently treated as the former franchisor.
  • Enquiry journey: No public verification, 0/4. No current direct ownership enquiry journey for the original network was verified. The supplied publications website does not substantiate such a journey.
  • Pre-acceptance discovery: No public verification, 0/4. No current original-network mutual-discovery and acceptance sequence was verified. Historical activity and successor operator recruitment do not establish this process.
  • Recruitment launch plan: No public verification, 0/3. No current original-network route-to-market plan was established following the closure evidence. Newer organisations need separately resolved records and terms.
04 Grow Critical Gap0/20

Grow: No current original-network recruitment engine was verified. Planned clubs and recruitment claims of newer organisations do not establish enquiry or agreement outcomes for this record.

  • Consistent monthly ownership enquiries: No public verification, 0/5. No current consecutive-month original-network ownership enquiry series was verified. Local member interest and successor recruitment are different measures.
  • Enquiry sources and prospect quality: No public verification, 0/4. No current original-network recruitment source and candidate-quality reporting was verified. Current contact routes of other brands are not transferred.
  • Enquiry-to-owner conversion: No public verification, 0/4. No current original-network enquiry-to-signed-owner cohort was verified. Historical clubs and new licence recruitment provide no valid present denominator.
  • Next locations or territories: No public verification, 0/3. No current original-network territory expansion plan was verified. The planned locations shown by BoB Connections concern that newer organisation.
  • Founder-independent recruitment: No public verification, 0/4. No current original-network recruitment team or process independent of the founder was verified. Dissolved-company and closure evidence makes continuity a prerequisite.
05 Amplify Weak Foundation8.5/20

Amplify: Historical local clubs and online profiles provide limited evidence of customer infrastructure. Current original-network owner coverage, support and reporting were not verified following the reported closure.

  • Local customer acquisition support: Partially, 2.5/5. Historical club promotion and referral structure support some local acquisition capability. Current central support obligations under the original network were not established.
  • Every owner represented online: Partially, 2/4. Historical group and member profiles show local online presence. Current complete original-network owner coverage was not reconciled, and newer club pages are not substituted.
  • Continuing local marketing plan: Partially, 2/4. The historical recurring club format supported continuing member activity. A current original-network local marketing plan and its delivery were not verified.
  • Individual enquiry and performance tracking: No public verification, 0/3. No current original-network individual owner enquiry and commercial performance reporting was verified. Historical member referral tools answer a different question.
  • Customers beyond personal networks: Partially, 2/4. Historical public club discovery could reach customers outside personal contacts. Current original-network implementation was not established after the reported conclusion.
25/100 Overall Five Fibre score

Five Fibre score: 25/100. Assess 8/20, Build 8.5/20, Launch 0/20, Grow 0/20, Amplify 8.5/20.

Assessment band: Fragile Foundation.

This record requires identity and eligibility reconciliation before it should be interpreted as a normal live-network assessment. The workbook names Business over Breakfast, points to a publications website and supplies an opportunity link for Business for Breakfast, BforB. These are not interchangeable references. Research into the BoB Clubs identity found historical networking activity and newer organisations continuing related local communities, but not evidence sufficient to treat BforB’s current franchise package as the offer belonging to this row.

The most material evidence concerns continuity. BoB Connections’ own material says that BoB Clubs operated for more than 20 years before concluding in 2024. A former Irish franchise holder describes establishing Prosper Networking Hubs after the original network’s closure. An official Companies House officer record identifies Business over Breakfast Limited, company 05004777, as dissolved. These sources reinforce one another, while still requiring care: a company’s dissolution alone does not prove every former local club stopped meeting or that no assets or rights continued elsewhere.

BoB Connections is a distinct current entity. Its primary website and Companies House record identify company 16189787, incorporated in January 2025, and its current material invites licence operators and area coordinators. It also claims a heritage connected to the former clubs. That is relevant context, but does not by itself establish a simple legal rename or an automatic transfer of every original franchise agreement. The row has therefore not been renamed, archived or reassigned during this scoring continuation. Those identity and status fields sit outside the authorised changes.

The score deliberately recognises limited historical evidence while treating current original-network capability as unverified. Historical clubs, defined meeting methods and online member profiles show that the former business was more than a concept. They do not establish current owner economics, a maintained operating manual or an accountable central team available to support a new original-network owner. The result should not be presented as a judgement on every former club organiser or on the commercial quality of BoB Connections or BforB, which would require their own correctly scoped assessments.

Assess is consequently constrained by the question of what an applicant would actually acquire now. A current offer needs an identified rights holder, available territories, applicable agreement, full cost structure and evidence of achievable owner returns. Membership fees and benefits published by a newer organisation cannot answer those questions for the former network. Nor should old directory listings or LinkedIn descriptions be treated as current recruitment simply because they remain searchable after the original organisation has concluded.

Build has some historical evidence of a repeatable networking format and member technology. The issue is present control and maintenance. Someone must be responsible for training operators, updating materials, protecting the brand experience and supporting local problems. Without confirming that relationship, the existence of a newer website or continuing local meetings cannot establish current original-franchisor infrastructure. A former licensee may continue a valuable community independently, which is different from the old national network continuing under unchanged rights and obligations.

Launch and Grow receive no current original-network verification. The incorrect BforB link cannot support a live applicant journey, candidate selection process or recruitment plan for this record. Similarly, BoB Connections’ planned locations and operator invitation concern its own expansion, not evidence of current enquiries or agreements for the former franchisor. Treating them as interchangeable would inflate the score and confuse prospects. The appropriate next action is a focused identity decision with a documented relationship between any successor and the historical record.

Amplify has historical local customer routes but an unresolved current owner population. Local club pages, member referrals and ongoing meetings may remain commercially useful, yet they do not establish who currently receives central support or which legal entity provides it. Before any public count or claim is refreshed, live clubs, independent organisers and current licence holders should be distinguished. The correct outcome may involve a separate current record, a clearly documented successor relationship or an archive decision, but this task does not authorise choosing among those possibilities silently.

This review therefore records the discrepancy prominently and preserves the existing row identity and status. It prevents unrelated brands’ costs, training, recruitment performance and customer systems from being carried into the assessment. The priority is to resolve the underlying record before spending effort on additional promotional or recruitment recommendations.

  • Assess: Establish the current rights holder and whether this remains an eligible original-network record.
  • Build: Confirm any contractual continuity of manuals, training and central support.
  • Launch: Remove reliance on another brand’s opportunity when separately authorised to correct identity fields.
  • Grow: Keep successor licence activity separate from original-network recruitment measures.
  • Amplify: Reconcile current clubs, organisers and licence owners before making coverage claims.

Benchmark

How this network compares.

Overall, against the whole Index
This network25
UK Index average64
Overall, against Business Consultancy, Services and Support (61 networks)
This network25
Industry average61

Explore Business Consultancy, Services and Support in the UK Franchise Data Explorer

Keep your profile accurate

This profile is built from independently researched public information. If you represent this network, take the Five Fibre scorecard for it. We check your answers against our research before any score changes.

Update your Five Fibre scores

Something out of date?

Franchise information changes. If something on this profile is wrong or has changed, tell us and we’ll check it.

Tell us what’s changed

The Five Fibre Franchise Growth Scorecard

Want to assess your own network?

See where your franchise growth foundations are strong, where they are exposed and where growth may be getting blocked. Twenty five questions, around five minutes.

Take the scorecard