Flat fees from £5k per month - One retainer, all five fibres.

The UK Franchise Growth Index

Diamond Home Support

Cleaning Services · Residential Cleaning · Domestic Cleaning

Diamond Home Support is a domestic services management franchise covering cleaning, home help and gardening. Local offices arrange services for households while using the network's brand, systems and support. The owner manages the business and customer relationships, with self-employed workers carrying out the practical work.

Read more about Diamond Home Support

Overall Five Fibre score
73/100
Assessment
Independent
Last reviewed
Data confidence
Low

The Five Fibre score measures this network against Twine Growth's Five Fibre Framework™ using the information available at the assessment date. It is not an endorsement, a financial recommendation or a recommendation to purchase a franchise.

About the network

More about Diamond Home Support.

The customer offer can include regular cleaning, ironing and broader household assistance, with availability varying by area. Home help is described as practical support such as shopping, laundry, companionship and accompanying people to appointments. It is distinguished from providing personal care, making the scope of the service important when matching workers with customer needs.

The current official recruitment page advertises a £9,000 start-up package and an exclusive territory typically covering around 100,000 households. It also includes an initial allocation of forty customer leads. Leads are potential enquiries rather than confirmed ongoing customers, and older directory prices should not automatically replace the current published package figure.

Initial learning is available online and supported by operating manuals and a one-hundred-step development programme covering the first six months. The published prospectus includes marketing materials, flyers, templates, social media content, a corporate email address and a profile on the network website. A business management application supports access to information and resources.

Continuing assistance includes first-year mentoring, coaching, webinars, podcasts and telephone or email support. Owners recruit suitable local workers and develop the client base using the provided approaches. The ongoing franchise charge is described as a fixed monthly fee rather than a percentage of turnover, while local marketing and the normal costs of running the business remain relevant.

At a glance

Diamond Home Support at a glance.

Industry
Cleaning Services
Franchise category
Residential Cleaning
Sub industry
Domestic Cleaning
Founded
2010
Franchising started
2011
Approximate franchisees
64
Headquarters
Sittingbourne
BFA member
No
UK origin
Yes
Recruitment status
Active

Investment

Franchise investment.

Investment from
£9,000
Management franchise
Yes
Home based
Yes
Executive franchise
Yes

View franchise opportunity

Investment figures change. Confirm current requirements directly with the franchise network before making any decision.

Five Fibre assessment

How the foundations score.

Every franchise network is assessed across the five connected areas Twine Growth believes support sustainable franchise growth.

How the Five Fibre score is calculated

01 Assess Strong13/20

Assess: The network demonstrates an established management model and meaningful owner replication. Its financial illustrations and conditional refund promise improve transparency, but do not establish representative achieved owner profit or remove business risk.

  • Profitable core business: Partially, 2.5/5. Named long-serving owners and multi-area expansion substantiate a replicated business. The published earnings examples are illustrations rather than a representative achieved profit distribution, so the profitable-core criterion receives partial credit.
  • Operates for 30 days without daily founder input: Partially, 2.5/5. Owners operate local businesses using shared systems and help from more than one head-office contact. A demonstrated 30-day period of successful operation without daily founder involvement across the franchise organisation was not found.
  • Ideal franchise owner defined: Yes, 3/3. The role is clearly management of customer relationships and worker availability rather than doing the cleaning personally. People skills, customer focus and willingness to develop the business are connected to the actual operating demands.
  • Realistic owner money: Partially, 2/4. The prospectus distinguishes illustrative profit development and warns results may fall short. That supports some commercial evaluation, but current achieved cohorts, owner workload and full cost assumptions are not published.
  • Different opportunity: Yes, 3/3. The offer combines cleaning, home help and gardening within a home-based management model and fixed franchise fees. These are specific proposition features; a conditional refund of the startup fee should not be described as eliminating all risk.
02 Build Scale Ready20/20

Build: Operating manuals, a staged startup pathway and a central business app provide concrete evidence of repeatable delivery. Recent app updates and named owner accounts support implementation beyond a generic promise of tools and training.

  • Documented operating playbook: Yes, 5/5. The current official package explicitly includes operating manuals and replicable systems. This is direct evidence of a documented owner playbook, without claiming that the private manuals have been audited for completeness.
  • Structured onboarding: Yes, 4/4. The staged pathway covers the first six months, supported by initial online training and first-year coaching. These specified mechanisms establish a structured startup process rather than leaving owners to interpret a collection of resources alone.
  • Documented brand experience: Yes, 4/4. Shared operating guidance, customer and worker templates and branded materials support consistent local delivery. The defined service model gives owners an established framework for matching clients and workers and managing their continuing relationship.
  • One central resource location: Yes, 3/3. The app is explicitly described as bringing owner data, training and support together. Recent official updates and the external opportunity profile corroborate the central resource environment rather than simply referring to unnamed software.
  • Launch without constant founder involvement: Yes, 4/4. The documented pathway, central resources and head-office support provide a supported launch without constant founder answers. Named owner accounts refer to both Andrew and Josh, strengthening evidence that routine help extends beyond one individual.
03 Launch Strong16.5/20

Launch: The current proposition explains the owner role, territory and support with a clear enquiry route. A discovery call is offered, but the complete selection sequence and a current dated recruitment campaign plan remain less publicly evident.

  • Clear franchise proposition: Yes, 5/5. The official opportunity clearly explains the management model, services, territory and support. It distinguishes business ownership from applying for cleaning work or enquiring as a household customer.
  • Targeted applicant attraction: Yes, 4/4. Recruitment addresses people seeking a home-based management business and explains that they recruit and support workers. This aligns the attraction message with relationship management rather than implying the owner simply sells cleaning hours personally.
  • Ownership enquiry journey: Yes, 4/4. The brochure enquiry captures location and funding position, with area availability and direct contact routes. The public prospectus was accessible separately, so its contents were inspected without submitting an application or contact details.
  • Pre-acceptance discovery: Partially, 2/4. The prospectus offers discovery contact and further supporting figures, but no complete current sequence of suitability checks, mutual validation and final approval was verified. A discovery-call invitation earns partial rather than full process credit.
  • Ownership go-to-market plan: Partially, 1.5/3. Current opportunity pages, territory listings and funding promotion show an active recruitment approach. A dated campaign plan with applicant segments, milestones and capacity allocation is not publicly established.
04 Grow Weak Foundation5/20

Grow: Published area availability supports geographic planning, while owner growth shows recruitment has occurred. Monthly applicant volumes, source quality and conversion are not disclosed, and recruitment delegation is only partly established.

  • Monthly ownership enquiries: No public verification, 0/5. Official news reports new owners joining in a particular month, but does not establish consistent monthly ownership enquiries. Customer enquiry records and cleaner applications are different demand measures and cannot fill that gap.
  • Enquiry sources and best prospects: No public verification, 0/4. No public comparison identifies ownership enquiry sources and the channels producing the best qualified applicants. Marketing services supplied to local owners concern end-customer demand rather than evidence of franchise recruitment attribution.
  • Ownership conversion: No public verification, 0/4. No applicant cohort, qualification denominator and completed ownership outcomes are disclosed. The number of existing franchisees or renewals cannot establish the missing enquiry-to-owner conversion rate.
  • Next territories: Yes, 3/3. The current area-availability page identifies geographic opportunities and distinguishes some resales. This supports a practical territory plan while the specific arrangements for Northern Ireland require separate confirmation.
  • Consistent recruitment without founder-driven conversations: Partially, 2/4. Head-office support extends beyond the founder and a recruitment contact appears in directory material. The full delegated selection and approval structure is not sufficiently evidenced to verify recruitment independent of founder conversations.
05 Amplify Scale Ready18/20

Amplify: Central marketing support, local customer pages and app-based enquiry progression provide strong acquisition infrastructure. The remaining limitation is verifying accurate online representation for every current owner across a network with several different location measures.

  • Local customer acquisition support: Yes, 5/5. The current package provides initial customer leads and marketing help, including local promotion and digital support. These are specific mechanisms for generating demand rather than expecting every owner to begin entirely with personal contacts.
  • Every owner represented online: Partially, 2/4. The office finder and inspected King’s Lynn page provide local contact and quotation routes. The different owner, area and office counts prevent a complete public reconciliation of universal owner coverage.
  • Continuing local marketing plan: Yes, 4/4. The package includes marketing strategies, continuing resources and a staged development pathway, reinforced by ongoing coaching. This provides an identifiable plan framework beyond opening-day advertising alone.
  • Individual owner enquiry and performance tracking: Yes, 3/3. The official August 2025 update explicitly describes tracking enquiries through to signed clients in the owner app. Combined with business data and reviews, this supports individual enquiry and performance monitoring rather than merely measuring website traffic.
  • Customers beyond personal networks: Yes, 4/4. Public local pages and central digital campaigns provide routes to unfamiliar households. The supplied customer pipeline and continuing marketing tools mean demand need not rely primarily on the owner’s acquaintances or the founder.
73/100 Overall Five Fibre score

Five Fibre score: 73/100. Assess 13/20, Build 20/20, Launch 16.5/20, Grow 5/20, Amplify 18/20.

Assessment band: Growth Ready.

Diamond Home Support presents a comparatively well-documented management franchise with operating owners, defined resources and continuing technology development. The owner coordinates local household demand and a network of service providers rather than carrying out the cleaning personally. Sustainable growth depends on both sides working together: enough suitable customers, enough reliable workers and a matching process that retains the relationship. The public offer contains practical support for that connection, particularly its staged startup process and business app. Its strongest evidence is therefore in Build and Amplify, while recruitment measurement and representative achieved financial outcomes remain less visible.

The scale measures require careful separation. The current franchise page states 64 franchisees operating 90 areas, while the general about page refers to more than 200 local offices. Territory-availability and older promotional pages also use different percentages of national coverage. These may describe owners, contractual areas, local service pages or different dates, but they are not interchangeable. The current owner-and-area distinction is more useful than treating every local place name as another franchisee. The existing factual columns have been preserved, with the discrepancy flagged for later reconciliation rather than silently replacing one measure with another.

The chronology is similarly clearer when milestones are separated. The prospectus describes starting the business in 2010 and rolling out franchising in 2011. Some other pages use 2011 in their founding summary while discussing earlier service activity. Those statements can describe different stages without necessarily contradicting one another. The business has public examples of owners operating several areas and renewing, which substantiate replication and continuity. They do not prove uniform profitability or that a particular owner can step away from management without affecting service. A management franchise still needs active attention to worker availability, customer issues and the local pipeline.

Current first-party material should take precedence over older directory fees. The official package and prospectus use a £9,000 startup amount, while some directory profiles still quote a lower historical fee. The current prospectus separately describes a fixed monthly charge beginning later in the startup period. That makes the recurring obligation more assessable, but the precise cash requirement also needs local marketing, worker recruitment, working capital and any funding costs. A low entry payment is not the same as a complete operating budget. Finance should be evaluated as an obligation within the business model rather than proof that the opportunity is affordable for every applicant.

The earnings illustrations are more informative than an unsupported high-income headline because the prospectus labels them as illustrative and acknowledges that owners can fall short. Even so, they are not a representative achieved cohort. The underlying client retention, management income per service hour, local worker supply, marketing cost and owner time remain important. The money-back promise is conditional and concerns the startup fee. It should not be interpreted as reimbursement of all expenditure, compensation for time or a guarantee of personal profit. The prospectus also uses income and turnover language around its threshold, so the contractual definition needs to be resolved before a candidate relies on it.

The launch pipeline contains another specific discrepancy. Much of the official website and the start of the prospectus promise forty initial customer leads, while later prospectus sections refer to sixty. These are leads, not guaranteed signed or retained customers. A dated package schedule should state the applicable number, qualification, timing and replacement conditions. This matters commercially because a new owner must have worker capacity available when enquiries arrive and a clear process for converting suitable households. Increasing the number of leads alone would not solve slow response, poor matching or a shortage of reliable local providers.

Build is supported by tangible mechanisms. The current package identifies manuals, a staged first-six-month pathway and ongoing coaching, and the app is presented as a central point for running the business and accessing support. The official news page reports successive app developments, giving evidence of implementation and maintenance rather than only an intention to introduce technology. At the same time, its May 2026 update describes further planned automation. Those future features have not been treated as already delivered. The existing operating environment earns credit without assuming that every planned improvement is available to current owners.

The support relationship also extends beyond a generic promise of lifetime help. Named owner accounts refer to Andrew and Josh, and external franchise material describes an in-house marketing capability. That strengthens the case for practical assistance and a launch that does not depend on constant founder answers. It does not fully establish the franchise recruitment approval structure, which is why Grow remains more conservative. Running support through a team and delegating the decision to accept a new owner are different organisational capabilities. Both should have clear responsibilities as the network adds territories or changes its funding offer.

Launch gives applicants useful information and a clear first contact. The prospectus includes a discovery-call route, but the complete current sequence of qualification, evidence sharing and agreement approval was not verified publicly. Grow similarly lacks monthly enquiry, source-quality and conversion data. The news page’s account of new owners joining during August 2025 demonstrates completed recruitment at that point, not the size or quality of the ownership pipeline. Its references to customer enquiries and cleaner applications describe the other commercial engine. A recruitment dashboard should keep those populations distinct and connect new-owner selection to support capacity and early local performance.

Amplify has unusually specific evidence of customer enquiry progression. The official app update says owners can track enquiries into signed clients, while the local office infrastructure provides routes for unfamiliar households to request service. This is stronger than simply listing national marketing activity. The next useful improvement is to join those records to ongoing customer retention, worker availability and the owner’s retained income. That would help identify whether an area needs more demand, better conversion or stronger delivery capacity. It would also provide a more credible financial story for future applicants than either award recognition or illustrative profit figures alone.

  • Grow: Measure monthly ownership enquiry sources, suitability and conversion separately from household enquiries and worker applications, with named recruitment decision owners.
  • Assess: Reconcile current costs, lead commitments and guarantee definitions, and support financial illustrations with clearly defined achieved owner cohorts.
  • Launch: Publish the full discovery and approval sequence, keeping all opportunity documents aligned with the current package.
  • Amplify: Reconcile owners, territories and local pages, then connect enquiry progression to retention, worker capacity and retained commercial value.
  • Build: Maintain controlled app and manual updates, distinguishing available tools from planned automation and monitoring support capacity as owners expand.

Benchmark

How this network compares.

Overall, against the whole Index
This network73
UK Index average64
Overall, against Cleaning Services (64 networks)
This network73
Industry average65

Explore Cleaning Services in the UK Franchise Data Explorer

Keep your profile accurate

This profile is built from independently researched public information. If you represent this network, take the Five Fibre scorecard for it. We check your answers against our research before any score changes.

Update your Five Fibre scores

Something out of date?

Franchise information changes. If something on this profile is wrong or has changed, tell us and we’ll check it.

Tell us what’s changed

The Five Fibre Franchise Growth Scorecard

Want to assess your own network?

See where your franchise growth foundations are strong, where they are exposed and where growth may be getting blocked. Twenty five questions, around five minutes.

Take the scorecard