Flat fees from £5k per month - One retainer, all five fibres.

The UK Franchise Growth Index

Just Shutters

Home Improvement and Renovations · Interior · Shutters

Just Shutters is a specialist window shutter franchise serving homeowners through local businesses under a national brand. The company developed from roots in Dorset and provides made-to-measure shutters with a service that includes advice, design visits and fitting. Its proposition centres on helping customers choose shutters suited to their home rather than supplying a standard product without consultation.

Read more about Just Shutters

Overall Five Fibre score
90/100
Assessment
Independent
Last reviewed
Data confidence
High

The Five Fibre score measures this network against Twine Growth's Five Fibre Framework™ using the information available at the assessment date. It is not an endorsement, a financial recommendation or a recommendation to purchase a franchise.

About the network

More about Just Shutters.

The range offers different styles, colours, materials and finishes. Customers can request a brochure, explore completed installations and arrange a home design visit. Local specialists advise on the options and provide a tailored quotation, with fitting included in the customer service. The brand also promotes a lifetime guarantee, subject to its applicable terms.

The franchise is designed as a home- and van-based business. Owners work within exclusive territories and develop customer relationships from enquiry through to completed installation. The published model does not require stock to be purchased in advance, and customers pay a deposit before their shutters are ordered. This links product purchasing to confirmed individual orders.

Applicants do not need previous shutter or fitting experience. The company looks for people who enjoy practical work, take pride in the finished installation and are comfortable dealing directly with customers. Published packages include a van, product samples, a sales pack and training, with different options intended to accommodate development of the business.

Support includes startup guidance, marketing, lead generation and a customer management system, followed by continuing help from the support team. The franchise owner remains responsible for day-to-day operation and local service. The model connects the brand's product range and systems with personal consultation and fitting by a specialist serving an agreed area.

At a glance

Just Shutters at a glance.

Industry
Home Improvement and Renovations
Franchise category
Interior
Sub industry
Shutters
Founded
2006
Franchising started
2009
Approximate franchisees
18
Headquarters
Bournemouth
BFA member
Yes
UK origin
Yes
Recruitment status
Active

Investment

Franchise investment.

Investment from
£17,550 plus VAT
Investment to
£33,950
Home based
Yes
Mobile
Yes

View franchise opportunity

Investment figures change. Confirm current requirements directly with the franchise network before making any decision.

Five Fibre assessment

How the foundations score.

Every franchise network is assessed across the five connected areas Twine Growth believes support sustainable franchise growth.

How the Five Fibre score is calculated

01 Assess Scale Ready20/20

Assess: 20/20. Just Shutters provides specific published franchisee profit representations, a defined owner profile and an established service model supported by a wider team. Full credit recognises the framework foundations, without certifying typical current earnings or independently auditing the figures.

  • A1, proven and profitable core model: Yes, 5/5. The opportunity page states that existing owners achieved first-year sales of £136,000 to £412,000 and net profits of £21,000 to £66,000, derived from current and past franchisee performance. This is more specific than a turnover-only ambition. The sample, accounting periods and precise profit adjustments are not disclosed, so the figures remain attributed franchisor representations rather than verified accounts.
  • A2, operates without daily founder involvement: Yes, 5/5. The current team page identifies franchise growth and support, commercial management, marketing, business support and appointment-setting responsibilities beyond founder Chris Rocker. Local owners deliver customer work. This structure supports the 30-day founder-independence principle for the operating model. No specific absence exercise was inspected, and it should not be interpreted as evidence that a new local owner can be absent without arrangements.
  • A3, understands its ideal franchisee: Yes, 3/3. The official franchisee-focus article identifies self-motivation, customer service, communication and a practical approach. Prior shutter experience is unnecessary because training is provided. These characteristics connect directly with surveying homes, discussing customer needs and fitting products. Applicants should assess their readiness for those responsibilities as well as their desire for greater control over their working life.
  • A4, owners can realistically make money following the model: Yes, 4/4. The achieved-profit representations support a credible owner earnings route. The package page separately labels its third-year figures as potential profit before tax, helping distinguish modelled outcomes from selected achieved results. Full credit does not establish that every territory reaches those levels. Owner capacity, local demand, overheads and the chosen operating structure still affect the result.
  • A5, meaningful differentiation: Yes, 3/3. The customer proposition combines made-to-measure products, home design advice, fitting and a published lifetime guarantee. These are tangible features of the buying experience. The score does not assume the guarantee is unconditional or independently substantiate the claim to be the largest specialist. Comparable competitors can exist while this remains a clear customer offer.

The foundation is strong. Keeping performance definitions and cost assumptions consistent across channels would make the investment evaluation more dependable.

02 Build Scale Ready18.5/20

Build: 18.5/20. Just Shutters publicly identifies a maintained operating manual, structured induction and practical central support. The narrower question of accessing every required tool through one central location is only partly established.

  • B1, documented operational playbook: Yes, 5/5. The official franchisee-focus article explicitly names The Hub as an online operations manual with continuing resources and updates. This establishes documented methods beyond informal advice. Private contents and revision history were not inspected, so full credit concerns the published existence and maintenance of the operating framework rather than an audit of every procedure.
  • B2, structured onboarding and training: Yes, 4/4. The recruitment homepage specifies a ten-day induction within a guided launch programme. Other official material describes product, installation, design, customer service, sales and CRM preparation. This connects practical delivery with managing the customer journey. Full credit does not establish completion or competence for every participant, which would require individual records.
  • B3, documented consistent brand: Yes, 4/4. The openly available agreement sets out approved stationery and vehicle branding requirements linked to the manual. These are written standards supporting recognisable presentation. The customer-acquisition article also describes centrally designed materials. The score recognises a documented approach without claiming that every local asset was inspected or that the published agreement is identical to every executed contract.
  • B4, all required tools in one central place: Partially, 1.5/3. The BFA campaign identifies The Hub and resources, while integrated business systems support the operating model. Together these provide meaningful infrastructure. The public descriptions do not establish that every system, template and required resource is accessed through one complete central route. An online manual is valuable, but does not automatically prove that broader requirement.
  • B5, launch without constant founder involvement: Yes, 4/4. The BFA profile describes academy training, ongoing mentoring, business development and central call handling and appointment setting. Find My Franchise also identifies integrated systems and administrative help. This supports an opening process backed by specialist functions rather than constant personal founder availability. Owner preparation and local execution remain necessary.

The practical gain would be to show how the manual, systems, tools and support contacts fit together for a new owner. That could reduce searching and avoidable uncertainty while building on the assets already described.

03 Launch Scale Ready20/20

Launch: 20/20. Just Shutters explains its business model, differentiates ownership options and publishes a mutual discovery process. The full score concerns the public structure of recruitment, without establishing the volume or commercial effectiveness of applications generated.

  • L1, clear franchise proposition: Yes, 5/5. The opportunity page explains a home-and-van business selling and fitting shutters, with territory rights, central support and an investment starting point. This connects the offer to recognisable work and customer demand. Applicants still need the full current cost schedule; a clear initial payment does not identify every setup expense or the working capital needed before trading stabilises.
  • L2, message suited to prospective owners: Yes, 4/4. Four packages distinguish entry-level ownership, a larger area and options involving greater team management. The descriptions help applicants consider investment, territory and the scale of involvement. The page contains slightly different descriptions of the large-territory staffing arrangement, so the intended setup needs confirming during discovery rather than assuming all packages involve identical work.
  • L3, clear enquiry journey: Yes, 4/4. The contact page offers an information request, telephone and WhatsApp routes, plus a call with Nick to arrange a Discovery Day. The form asks for contact details, postcode and area of interest. These are understandable next steps for a prospective owner. No form or booking was submitted, so response times and subsequent follow-up were not tested.
  • L4, structured discovery before acceptance: Yes, 4/4. The official FAQ describes a selective initial telephone conversation, a face-to-face meeting covering expectations and financial information, followed by a more formal review and possible offer. It also welcomes conversations with existing owners. This establishes evaluation before acceptance, rather than enquiry followed immediately by payment. Individual application files and approval decisions were not inspected.
  • L5, ownership opportunity go-to-market: Yes, 3/3. The October 2026 exhibition report describes the team meeting prospective owners and discussing the opportunity, while the public LinkedIn page carries ownership calls to action. These demonstrate targeted recruitment beyond customer marketing. Exhibition conversations and social activity cannot by themselves establish qualified monthly enquiry totals or the number of agreements attributable to either channel.

The recruitment journey is coherent. Consistent financial wording and clear package responsibilities would make it easier for applicants to compare the offer with their own circumstances.

04 Grow Developing11.5/20

Grow: 11.5/20. Just Shutters provides direct evidence of delegated recruitment, specific territory opportunities and some stage conversion. Public evidence does not establish a complete monthly ownership-enquiry record with source quality and enquiry-to-agreement outcomes.

  • G1, monthly franchise ownership enquiries: Partially, 2.5/5. The October 2026 exhibition report describes conversations with prospective owners, alongside continuing public recruitment routes. This demonstrates actual ownership interest rather than customer demand alone. Monthly totals, trends and the consistency of suitable applications are not disclosed. Partial credit recognises visible acquisition activity without converting event attendance or social engagement into invented enquiry figures.
  • G2, enquiry sources and strongest prospects: No, 0/4. The business-site privacy policy describes website referrer analytics, but this does not verify source capture against identifiable ownership enquiries or analysis of which sources produce suitable owners. The visible recruitment form has no explicit referral-source question. Such tracking could exist through hidden fields or internal records; zero concerns the evidence available, not a conclusion that internal attribution is absent.
  • G3, enquiry-to-agreement conversion: Partially, 2/4. The FAQ states that over half of people met face-to-face became franchisees over the preceding year, while acknowledging that the initial-enquiry percentage is difficult to state. This is relevant stage conversion. It does not provide the requested all-enquiry denominator, a fixed reporting year, cohort counts or signed-agreement reconciliation. It was therefore not presented as a complete recruitment conversion rate.
  • G4, next locations identified: Yes, 3/3. The official resale page names Bristol and Kent, while the availability page describes defined territories and an area-checking route. These provide specific ownership opportunities beyond a general national invitation. Resales and newly allocated areas have different commercial circumstances. Availability and the present terms need confirming directly before an applicant relies on a listing.
  • G5, recruitment delegated beyond the founder: Yes, 4/4. The contact page explicitly directs prospective owners to Nick for a telephone meeting and Discovery Day. The exhibition report also shows the commercial team participating in recruitment activity. This directly evidences owner-facing responsibilities beyond the founder, without assuming that final acceptance decisions require no senior involvement.

The useful next step is to join existing recruitment activity into one consistent record of source, suitability, stage, territory, next action and agreement outcome. That would reveal where growth is constrained and which activity deserves more investment.

05 Amplify Scale Ready20/20

Amplify: 20/20. Just Shutters publishes a connected customer-acquisition and support structure, with local online presence, continuing marketing planning and individual business reporting requirements. Full credit recognises those provisions and described processes, without certifying their execution or results for every owner.

  • AM1, helps owners generate local customer enquiries: Yes, 5/5. The opportunity page states that central activity generates 75% of leads, and the official franchisee-focus article describes collecting and checking enquiries, setting appointments and managing owner calendars. This is direct help with customer acquisition and handling. The percentage is a franchisor claim without a disclosed sample or measurement period; it is not a guaranteed allocation to each territory.
  • AM2, every owner has a local online presence: Yes, 4/4. The BFA profile explicitly includes dedicated local website pages in the owner support package. The observed Surrey page identifies its local owners, telephone number and visit request routes. This supports systematic provision rather than relying on a national homepage alone. Every individual page was not audited for current ownership, search performance or conversion.
  • AM3, ongoing local marketing plan: Yes, 4/4. The published agreement defines an annual business plan incorporating marketing and financial targets, with a requirement to agree the next year's plan before the anniversary. That directly supports continuing owner-level planning beyond launch resources. It is evidence of the stated framework, not proof that every current plan was inspected or every agreed action completed.
  • AM4, individual customer enquiries and performance tracked: Yes, 3/3. Surrey's customer forms request discovery source, central support handles leads and appointments, and the published agreement requires individual monthly financial information and current software records accessible to the franchisor. Together these support enquiry and owner-performance monitoring. Full credit does not claim a particular dashboard, comprehensive attribution accuracy or an audit of private records.
  • AM5, acquisition beyond personal networks and referrals: Yes, 4/4. The customer-acquisition article describes print, paid digital activity, social media and search optimisation. These provide routes to people outside an owner's existing relationships. Recommendations remain useful, but the published approach is broader. The score concerns available channels, not a finding that visibility automatically produces profitable orders.

The commercial connection is between suitable demand, booked visits, completed installations and owner returns. Reviewing those stages together helps prevent a growing appointment diary from concealing weak conversion or delivery capacity.

90/100 Overall Five Fibre score

Just Shutters scores 90/100, placing it in the Scale Ready band under the Five Fibre framework. Assess, Launch and Amplify each score 20/20, with Assess recorded as strongest under the framework's tie order. Build scores 18.5/20. Grow is weakest at 11.5/20, principally because complete ownership recruitment measurement is less visible publicly than the customer-acquisition and delivery systems.

The published model connects a defined customer offer with training, central business support and local ownership. A prospective owner can see what the work involves and follow a discovery route before a possible offer. Customer enquiries receive practical support through appointment handling and local online provision. The main growth question is whether ownership recruitment is managed with the same clarity about sources, stages and outcomes.

The three priorities below follow the lowest scores, with framework order resolving the remaining tie. The third priority concerns improving the quality of investment evidence within an already full-scoring fibre, rather than asserting a failed framework question.

  • Priority 1, Grow: connect each ownership enquiry with its source and outcome. Use one record for initial interest, relevant territory, qualification, meeting, decision and signed agreement. Review cohorts over a stated period and identify how many suitable prospects each source produces. The useful comparison is between channels that bring appropriate potential owners and the agreements they eventually support, rather than total event conversations or social reach. Recording the next action and responsible person would also make it easier to distinguish slow follow-up from weak applicant fit or territory constraints. Existing processes may already support parts of this; the missing public evidence concerns the complete connection.
  • Priority 2, Build: show the complete access route to operating resources. The published manual and systems are meaningful assets. Explain how a new owner finds current instructions, tools, approved materials, training and support contacts, including which system is authoritative when information changes. A concise resource map and revision process could resolve the remaining central-access question. The purpose is to help an owner use the existing framework confidently, rather than create additional documents that duplicate it. This becomes more valuable as different ownership packages involve different team sizes and responsibilities.
  • Priority 3, Assess: reconcile the investment and earnings narrative across channels. Provide one dated explanation distinguishing achieved results, selected examples, modelled profit and the owner's personal income. Show the period, operating structure, cost assumptions and exclusions behind each figure. This would preserve the strength of the published financial case while making it easier for an applicant to understand which evidence is relevant to their intended package and territory. It would also help avoid apparently conflicting figures creating doubt before a discovery conversation has begun.

There is a specific financial discrepancy to resolve. The current opportunity page gives achieved first-year net profits of £21,000 to £66,000. The public LinkedIn description gives a different first-year range of £48,000 to £120,000. No common cohort or reconciliation was identified. The website's more detailed presentation was used for scoring; the social figure was recorded as inconsistent rather than combined into a larger earnings range. Neither representation was independently audited.

The recruitment homepage also describes potential earnings above £100,000 in year three using salary wording linked to Entry Level Plus, while the package table labels £98,298 for that option as potential profit before tax. The distinction between business profit and personal salary matters. These presentations do not establish one directly comparable take-home figure. Public financial footnotes refer to a February 2024 update despite saying figures are reassessed annually, so the assessment does not certify that the underlying sample was refreshed for November 2026.

Investment should be evaluated in the same way. Published package payments range from £17,550 plus VAT to £33,950 plus VAT, while the FAQ separately identifies working capital of £5,000 to £15,000. Resales have different pricing and circumstances. These amounts should not be treated as interchangeable complete startup budgets. Applicants need a current schedule showing included assets, continuing charges, additional equipment and their personal financial provision during the early trading period.

The recruitment conversion evidence is useful but limited. The FAQ's statement about more than half of face-to-face prospects proceeding concerns a later stage after initial telephone selection. It cannot be applied to every initial enquiry. Without a fixed reporting period and cohort counts, it also cannot establish the current annual recruitment performance. Keeping those definitions clear allows the business to investigate whether the constraint is attracting suitable interest, securing meetings or reaching an informed mutual decision.

The public agreement provides unusually specific operational evidence. Its annual planning and monthly reporting provisions support the customer-growth assessment, alongside central appointment handling and local source capture. It is an unexecuted published document, not evidence that every owner signed identical terms or supplied every report. The score recognises the stated operating framework and corroborating service descriptions while keeping actual compliance and private commercial performance unverified.

Research covered official recruitment and customer pages, local Surrey provision, ownership stories, the published agreement, BFA material, a directory, an exhibition report and public LinkedIn activity. No enquiry, call booking or application was submitted, and private systems and accounts were not accessed. Missing public evidence limits verification rather than demonstrating absent capability. The practical opportunity is to connect a strong customer operating model with equally clear ownership recruitment measurement and consistent investment information.

Benchmark

How this network compares.

Overall, against the whole Index
This network90
UK Index average64
Overall, against Home Improvement and Renovations (29 networks)
This network90
Industry average63

Explore Home Improvement and Renovations in the UK Franchise Data Explorer

Keep your profile accurate

This profile is built from independently researched public information. If you represent this network, take the Five Fibre scorecard for it. We check your answers against our research before any score changes.

Update your Five Fibre scores

Something out of date?

Franchise information changes. If something on this profile is wrong or has changed, tell us and we’ll check it.

Tell us what’s changed

The Five Fibre Franchise Growth Scorecard

Want to assess your own network?

See where your franchise growth foundations are strong, where they are exposed and where growth may be getting blocked. Twenty five questions, around five minutes.

Take the scorecard