The UK Franchise Growth Index

MyHome

Cleaning Services · Residential Cleaning · Domestic Cleaning

MyHome is a residential-cleaning brand whose current UK website presents a North London service business. The site's account identifies Niall and Suzanne Power as the husband-and-wife team who started their operation in 2005 after working as City professionals. Their stated aim was to provide domestic cleaning with home security and dependable service at its centre.

More about MyHome.

The customer offer includes trained, uniformed and equipped staff, secure key handling and a structured Tri-Zonal Cleaning System. Published information describes vetted and DBS-checked personnel, automated payment and invoicing, and cleaning adapted to the customer's requirements. The service is marketed to households seeking regular professional help and confidence in allowing cleaners access to their homes.

Recruitment, staff training and consistent procedures feature strongly in the company's explanation of how the service is delivered. Its about page describes a focus on care, dependability and expertise, alongside a commitment to returning to clean again if a customer is dissatisfied under the stated guarantee. These are features of the published customer operation, rather than a specification for a new franchise applicant.

The MyHome name also has a longer franchise history. Franchise Brands published a proposed relaunch of a MyHome domestic-cleaning opportunity in 2016, referring to methods originally developed by Unilever. Subsequent regulatory reporting stated that a full relaunch was not considered commercially appropriate. Those dated corporate announcements should not be treated as proof of a current nationwide recruitment offer from the business now using the consumer website.

A marketing supplier's case study describes work on a franchise strategy, launch marketing and operating manuals for MyHome. That supports franchise-development activity, but the reviewed current consumer pages do not establish a complete recruitment package, available territories, investment fee or verified owner total. The current North London operation, the historical franchise brand and any new franchise-development work therefore need to be understood in their specific published contexts.

At a glance

MyHome at a glance.

Industry: Cleaning Services
Franchise category: Residential Cleaning
Sub industry: Domestic Cleaning
Founded: 2000
Approximate locations: 1
Headquarters: London
BFA member: No
UK origin: Yes
Recruitment status: Active

Investment

Franchise investment.

Management franchise: Yes
Retail premises: Yes
Executive franchise: Yes

Visit the website

Investment figures change. Confirm current requirements directly with the franchise network before making any decision.

Five Fibre assessment

How the foundations score.

Every franchise network is assessed across the five connected areas Twine Growth believes support sustainable franchise growth.

How the Five Fibre score is calculated

01 Assess Developing10/20

Assess: The recorded UK website demonstrates an established London cleaning operation, but does not currently substantiate the national franchise opportunity described in older directories. The assessment therefore gives limited credit for historical replication and present service delivery while keeping current ownership availability, representative financial returns and the precise franchisor identity unresolved. A familiar trading name is insufficient to combine different operators, countries and reporting periods.

Profitable core business: Partially, 2.5/5. The London website shows a continuing service offer and customer feedback. Neither longevity nor reviews establish achieved representative net profit after wages, travel, materials and central charges.

Operates for 30 days without daily founder input: Partially, 2.5/5. Full-time cleaning teams and a defined method support delegation of delivery. No current thirty-day founder-absence test or equivalent independent management evidence was verified for the UK business.

Ideal franchise owner defined: Partially, 1.5/3. Historical profiles describe a management franchise requiring communication and sales skills. A current UK owner specification linked to the recorded operator and available rights was not established.

Realistic owner money: Partially, 2/4. Older investment and working-capital illustrations provide limited context. No current reconciled funding schedule or achieved owner-level retained income was available to validate the economics today.

Different opportunity: Partially, 1.5/3. Security and a systematic premium cleaning approach distinguish the consumer offer. The precise current ownership package and its advantages over competing UK management franchises remain less clearly evidenced.

02 Build Weak Foundation8.5/20

Build: Public material supports a repeatable cleaning method and an employed service team. Historical franchising sources describe a broader support package, but its current delivery to UK owners was not established. The distinction is between an operating cleaning business and a maintained system through which new independent owners can learn and launch it. The available evidence does not justify transferring Australian technology or another current group brand’s infrastructure into this UK assessment.

Documented operating playbook: Partially, 2.5/5. The primary Tri-Zonal material describes a repeatable cleaning approach. It is partial evidence of process transfer, not verification of a comprehensive current franchise operating manual.

Structured onboarding: Partially, 2/4. Current material describes cleaner training and historical directories describe owner instruction. A complete current UK onboarding programme with stages, responsibilities and readiness checks was not verified.

Documented brand experience: Partially, 2/4. Published service expectations, equipment and customer terms provide consistency components. They do not establish a complete current brand-experience manual distributed to a verified UK owner network.

One central resource location: No public verification, 0/3. No current UK owner portal containing operational instructions, templates and systems was verified. The Australian MyOP application cannot be assumed available under this recorded UK business.

Launch without constant founder involvement: Partially, 2/4. A functioning team and historical support descriptions suggest some repeatability. Current founder-independent franchise launch support, delegated responsibilities and an applicable agreement package were not publicly established.

03 Launch Critical Gap4.5/20

Launch: The historical management proposition is understandable, but the present recorded site addresses customers seeking cleaners. Old directory invitations cannot establish that new UK territories are currently available. A customer quote form also does not provide an ownership enquiry journey. The immediate requirement is to resolve which organisation, if any, is accepting applicants before improving the recruitment message or assuming that an obsolete listing remains commercially actionable.

Clear franchise proposition: Partially, 2.5/5. Older UK listings explain a cleaning management opportunity. The current primary site does not confirm that package or identify new UK rights being offered to prospective owners.

Targeted applicant attraction: Partially, 2/4. Historic applicant messaging distinguishes business management from doing every clean personally. Its suitability criteria and availability were not verified as a current recruitment campaign for this business.

Ownership enquiry journey: No public verification, 0/4. The current website offers customer quotes and general enquiries. No dedicated current UK ownership route, with identifiable responsibility for an applicant’s next steps, was verified.

Pre-acceptance discovery: No public verification, 0/4. No current brand-specific mutual discovery sequence was established. Generic directory steps cannot demonstrate financial validation, territory assessment or suitability checks before acceptance into this particular network.

Ownership go-to-market plan: No public verification, 0/3. Historical relaunch publicity and present consumer pages are different assets. No current UK ownership launch plan with channels, responsibilities, timing and available territories was found.

04 Grow Critical Gap0/20

Grow: No current UK ownership recruitment engine was verified for this exact recorded business. Historical network descriptions, current cleaning bookings and Australian franchise announcements concern different periods, outcomes or jurisdictions. Scores of zero mean the specific recruitment measures could not be established from public evidence. They should not be read as proof that the active London operator has no customers, no effective staff or poor service standards.

Monthly ownership enquiries: No public verification, 0/5. No current monthly UK franchise-enquiry series was verified. Cleaning customer requests cannot be substituted for ownership demand, and historical interest does not establish regularity today.

Enquiry sources and best prospects: No public verification, 0/4. No current source-to-suitability analysis for UK ownership applicants was located. Website analytics or customer enquiry handling, if present privately, would not by themselves establish recruitment-channel quality.

Ownership conversion: No public verification, 0/4. No current UK ownership enquiry-to-agreement conversion figures were found. An old franchisee case study does not provide the applicants, decisions and reporting period needed for that calculation.

Next territories: No public verification, 0/3. No verified current prioritised UK territory programme was identified. London service-area pages describe where customers can obtain cleaning, rather than which ownership rights will be developed next.

Consistent recruitment without founder-driven conversations: No public verification, 0/4. No current delegated UK franchise-recruitment function was verified. Former group support and overseas recruitment structures cannot establish founder-independent handling for the business recorded in this row.

05 Amplify Developing10/20

Amplify: The UK customer offer has local service pages, public contact routes and a recognisable service method. These are useful demand-generation assets for the trading operation. However, the public evidence does not connect them to a reconciled roster of UK franchise owners, continuing individual local plans or owner-level commercial reporting.

Local customer acquisition support: Partially, 2.5/5. Historical sources describe local launch promotion, while the recorded operator maintains customer acquisition routes. Current delivery of a defined support service to UK franchisees remains only partly established.

Every owner represented online: Partially, 2/4. London service-area pages provide local customer access. They are not a reconciled current franchise-owner directory, so complete individual coverage across a UK network cannot be assumed.

Continuing local marketing plan: No public verification, 0/4. No current ongoing local marketing plan for each UK owner was verified. A functioning customer website and historical launch publicity do not establish that continuing planning mechanism.

Individual owner enquiry and performance tracking: Partially, 1.5/3. The primary offer describes automated invoicing and customer contact processes. These are measurement components, but not verified joined enquiry, booking and retained-performance reporting for every independent owner.

Customers beyond personal networks: Yes, 4/4. Public search pages, service information, telephone access and quote requests create customer routes beyond personal introductions. Their profitability and geographic franchise coverage remain separate questions for verification.

33/100 Overall Five Fibre score

Five Fibre score: 33/100. Assess 10/20, Build 8.5/20, Launch 4.5/20, Grow 0/20, Amplify 10/20.

Assessment band: Fragile Foundation.

MyHome requires an identity and continuity qualification before its historical franchise claims can be interpreted as a current UK opportunity. The recorded myhome.co.uk website is an active London domestic and commercial cleaning offer. It does not visibly present the national ownership recruitment system described by older directories. The score therefore recognises service delivery and historical replication, while withholding unsupported credit for current UK owner acquisition and network infrastructure. This is an assessment of publicly evidenced franchise readiness, rather than a conclusion that the London cleaning business has ceased trading.

The primary About page says Niall and Suzanne Power started their business in 2005. Niall’s professional profile identifies Powerhome Ltd trading as MyHome Residential Services. Companies House records Powerhome Limited, company 06468258, as active, incorporated in January 2008, with the same Vale Road operating address. Its officer register identifies Niall James Power as director and Suzanne Power as secretary. These sources connect the local operation more specifically than a search for companies simply containing the common name MyHome. Unrelated similarly named entities should not be used to infer either closure or current franchise capacity.

The wider franchise history is different. Franchise Brands’ 2016 admission document explains its acquisition of former MyHome International subsidiaries in 2008, a subsequent joint venture and reacquisition of the remaining interest in 2015. A March 2016 primary announcement identifies Niall Power as a MyHome franchisee, not the originator of the entire historical international concept. A later local business history describing a 2005 start can refer to the local enterprise without replacing that earlier brand history. The important commercial connection is which rights and support obligations exist now, rather than forcing all dates into a single founding narrative.

A later company announcement supplies a significant change that old directories omit. Franchise Brands’ audited 2023 results, announced in June 2024, refer to one-off income in 2022 from selling the MyHome domain name. The current group brand page lists its present operating portfolio without MyHome. Neither fact alone establishes every historic agreement has ended, and the sale of a domain is not automatically the sale of every brand right or customer contract. Together they make it unsafe to describe the current recorded website as a fully supported member of today’s Franchise Brands recruitment portfolio without further evidence.

Country must also be kept explicit. Current Australian MyHome material describes MyOP technology and management franchises. A November/December 2026 magazine feature directs prospective owners to an Australian franchise website and uses Australian locations, currency and employment terminology. Its publication date makes it recent, but not relevant proof of UK availability. Importing that central application, training system or reported overseas owner outcomes would materially overstate the UK evidence. The assessment has therefore not credited those systems as if they were demonstrably supplied to the business recorded here.

Older UK investment information needs similar restraint. Point Franchise lists a £19,995 fee and separately describes £10,000 working capital, while displaying a £10,000 minimum. These are different measures and should not be collapsed into a single all-in entry price. The same listing gives 350 locations, yet its narrative links that scale to a wider multi-brand group. It does not establish 350 current UK MyHome franchises or independent owners. No current primary UK package, royalty schedule or reconciled owner roster was verified. These discrepancies are recorded here without changing the workbook’s unrelated factual or recruitment-status fields.

Assess recognises an intelligible premium service business with an established local team. The primary method page describes a systematic approach to cleaning, and customer-facing material stresses home security and trained personnel. Those characteristics can help repeatability. However, a household’s cleaning charge must fund cleaner time, travel, absence cover, supplies, administration and customer acquisition before it becomes an owner’s income. Neither historical promotional claims nor positive customer reviews supply that reconciliation. Representative achieved owner economics would be required to validate the current commercial case rather than treating turnover or a busy team as sufficient.

Build has partial evidence in the cleaning process, cleaner preparation and published customer expectations. The missing connection is the current transfer mechanism for an independent UK owner. A service team can perform well under experienced local management without the business having a maintained franchise manual, structured owner onboarding or a complete central resource library. Those mechanisms may exist privately, but were not established publicly. Confirmation should identify the current responsible organisation, applicable agreement and practical route through training, launch and ongoing support. It should also distinguish a cleaner’s induction from an owner learning to recruit, price and manage a business.

Launch and Grow cannot be supported by consumer website activity alone. The current contact route is designed around obtaining services, while older franchise listings continue to circulate. A prospective owner needs to know whether a UK territory is actually being offered, who controls it and how a mutual decision would be reached. No enquiry was submitted and no private sales response was tested. There was no verified monthly ownership pipeline, applicant source-quality analysis or enquiry-to-agreement conversion cohort. That information would explain recruitment repeatability; the number of London service pages would not.

Amplify has useful customer-facing assets, including geographically relevant information, public communication routes and multiple services. Their practical value depends on generating suitable demand, answering promptly and delivering reliably. More enquiries would be unhelpful if cleaner capacity, journey time or repeat-customer retention were the constraint. The present evidence does not show a continuing individual plan or comparable owner-level reporting across a UK network. Improving that connection would begin with a verified roster and a clear understanding of who owns each customer relationship, rather than assuming a local landing page equals a supported franchise territory.

The practical outcome is to resolve the present UK franchise proposition before recommending expansion. The recorded recruitment status remains unchanged within this narrowly authorised scoring update, but should be reconciled against the absence of a verified current primary ownership invitation. Historical evidence remains useful for understanding the operating lineage. It should not be used to imply that a prospective franchisee can purchase the same package today, nor should uncertainty be translated into a claim that the active local service business has closed.

Grow: Establish whether current UK ownership recruitment exists, identify its responsible team and rights, then measure monthly suitable applicants, sources and conversion before planning further awards.

Launch: Replace ambiguous legacy invitations with a dated primary UK proposition and explicit enquiry and mutual-discovery journey if recruitment is genuinely available.

Build: Verify the current owner manual, staged onboarding, central resources and delegated launch support. Keep Australian systems separate unless UK access is expressly established.

Assess: Reconcile brand, local operating and corporate histories, then validate the complete present investment and representative owner retained returns under the actual UK agreement.

Amplify: Map current independent owners to local acquisition assets and connect enquiries, bookings, cleaner capacity and retained contribution to practical continuing local plans.

Benchmark

How this network compares.

Overall, against the whole Index

This network33

UK Index average64

Overall, against Cleaning Services (64 networks)

This network33

Industry average65

Explore Cleaning Services in the UK Franchise Data Explorer

Sources

Research sources.

16 public sources used for this profile

Keep your profile accurate

This profile is built from independently researched public information. If you represent this network, take the Five Fibre scorecard for it. We check your answers against our research before any score changes.

Update your Five Fibre scores

Something out of date?

Franchise information changes. If something on this profile is wrong or has changed, tell us and we’ll check it.

Tell us what’s changed

The Five Fibre Franchise Growth Scorecard

Want to assess your own network?

See where your franchise growth foundations are strong, where they are exposed and where growth may be getting blocked. Twenty five questions, around five minutes.

Take the scorecard