Flat fees from £5k per month - One retainer, all five fibres.

The UK Franchise Growth Index

PetStay

Pet Services · Pet Care · Pet Boarding

PetStay is a home dog boarding franchise founded by Carole Davy in 2005. The official history describes development across Yorkshire and Lincolnshire before franchising began in 2012. The service provides an alternative to kennels by arranging for dogs to stay in the homes of local carers while their owners are away.

Read more about PetStay

Overall Five Fibre score
73/100
Assessment
Independent
Last reviewed
Data confidence
Low

The Five Fibre score measures this network against Twine Growth's Five Fibre Framework™ using the information available at the assessment date. It is not an endorsement, a financial recommendation or a recommendation to purchase a franchise.

About the network

More about PetStay.

The franchisee operates a home-based management business, recruiting carers and matching them with customers' dogs. Owners may also choose to board dogs themselves. This separates the responsibility for organising the local service from the carer's role in providing daily care during a stay.

The Oxfordshire branch explains that its boarding arrangement accommodates dogs from one household at a time, with carers choosing the number and size of dogs they can accept. Owners supply food, bedding and other familiar items, and routines are discussed before the stay. Carer suitability, references and insurance arrangements feature in the published process.

The franchise package includes an exclusive area, two days of initial training at head office in East Riding and continuing support. Published subjects include marketing, lead generation, sales and conversion of enquiries into bookings. Operating resources include a manual, branded materials, a local website presence and a purpose-built booking system.

The current recruitment page reports twenty-five branches and describes regional contact and a private franchisee forum for sharing experience. It also carries a Spring 2026 price promotion, which should not automatically be assumed to remain available later. The documented model combines local customer and carer relationships with central systems, while branch numbers remain distinct from the much larger number of potential host homes.

At a glance

PetStay at a glance.

Industry
Pet Services
Franchise category
Pet Care
Sub industry
Pet Boarding
Founded
2005
Franchising started
2012
Approximate locations
25
Headquarters
Hull
BFA member
Yes
UK origin
Yes
Recruitment status
Active

Investment

Franchise investment.

Investment from
£6,995 plus VAT
Home based
Yes

View franchise opportunity

Investment figures change. Confirm current requirements directly with the franchise network before making any decision.

Five Fibre assessment

How the foundations score.

Every franchise network is assessed across the five connected areas Twine Growth believes support sustainable franchise growth.

How the Five Fibre score is calculated

01 Assess Strong13/20

Assess: Named long-serving owners and a defined matching service establish a replicated UK model. Financial wording, branch-count differences and the distinction between arrangement income and carer payments limit conclusions about representative achieved owner profit.

  • Profitable core business: Partially, 2.5/5. The January 2026 BFA account identifies owners operating Derby and Nottingham for a decade. This supports replication and continuity but does not establish a representative achieved net-profit cohort across current owners.
  • Operates for 30 days without daily founder input: Partially, 2.5/5. Named local operators, head-office support and a separate development manager provide organisational depth. A demonstrated thirty-day period of network operation without daily founder involvement was not found publicly.
  • Ideal franchise owner defined: Yes, 3/3. The current opportunity connects suitability to communication, multitasking, computer skills and managing a carer network. It distinguishes management ownership from optional personal boarding and from applying to become a dog carer.
  • Realistic owner money: Partially, 2/4. Entry prices and selected monthly earnings are public, but the earnings definition, recurring charges and representative achieved outcomes are incomplete. Customer daily prices include different payment components and cannot be treated as retained owner income.
  • Different opportunity: Yes, 3/3. The matching service, advance carer meeting and separation of visiting dogs from different households provide an identifiable proposition. The local owner manages demand and carers rather than simply operating a conventional boarding kennel.
02 Build Scale Ready18.5/20

Build: An explicit operations manual, specified induction and documented customer process support a repeatable business. A supplier case study describes integrated management technology, but complete central access to every owner resource remains only partly established.

  • Documented operating playbook: Yes, 5/5. The current official package explicitly includes an operations manual containing standards and required business documents. This directly establishes a documented owner playbook without claiming that private contents have been independently audited.
  • Structured onboarding: Yes, 4/4. The primary opportunity specifies two days at head office following initial discussions, while an external profile details business and technical modules. Named owners corroborate induction and subsequent trading rather than leaving implementation entirely hypothetical.
  • Documented brand experience: Yes, 4/4. The operations manual and published customer terms define the booking experience, matching, payments and service responsibilities. The maintained local page format supports consistent representation of those core processes.
  • One central resource location: Partially, 1.5/3. The supplier case study describes a unified branch and headquarters management platform, and PetStay names its booking system. Full access to manuals, marketing templates and all training from that same environment was not established.
  • Launch without constant founder involvement: Yes, 4/4. Head-office support, a manual, specified training and peer assistance provide a practical launch route. Current recruitment contact and longstanding owner accounts show support extends beyond constant founder answers, without proving complete organisational independence.
03 Launch Strong16.5/20

Launch: The UK proposition explains the management role and provides a clear enquiry and booking route to a named development manager. The full pre-acceptance validation sequence and a dated ownership campaign plan remain less visible.

  • Clear franchise proposition: Yes, 5/5. The opportunity explains recruiting carers, matching dogs and managing bookings from home. It distinguishes becoming a franchise owner from being paid an allowance to board dogs personally.
  • Targeted applicant attraction: Yes, 4/4. The applicant specification connects enthusiasm for dogs with communication, organisation and computer skills. It helps candidates assess the management responsibilities rather than presenting the opportunity as simply spending time with pets.
  • Ownership enquiry journey: Yes, 4/4. The dedicated form requests background and postcode information, and a named development manager offers a scheduled call. These are clear ownership routes distinct from the customer booking and carer application journeys.
  • Pre-acceptance discovery: Partially, 2/4. An initial call and virtual meeting are described before both parties progress towards training. The full current process for financial review, owner validation, agreement scrutiny and final acceptance was not verified publicly.
  • Ownership go-to-market plan: Partially, 1.5/3. The opportunity page and campaign offer demonstrate recruitment activity. The promotion is labelled Spring 2026, so its current commercial validity and a dated ongoing ownership launch plan require confirmation rather than being assumed.
04 Grow Developing9/20

Grow: The enquiry form captures source information, named resales provide geographic opportunities and recruitment has a contact beyond the founder. Monthly enquiry consistency, comparative source quality and applicant conversion remain unverified publicly.

  • Monthly ownership enquiries: No public verification, 0/5. No consistent monthly franchise enquiry series was disclosed. Customer bookings, repeat-business percentages and carer applications concern different commercial populations and do not establish ownership applicant demand.
  • Enquiry sources and best prospects: Partially, 2/4. The form explicitly asks how an applicant heard about the franchise. This establishes source capture, while comparison of those sources against suitability and completed ownership outcomes remains unverified.
  • Ownership conversion: No public verification, 0/4. No applicant cohort links initial enquiries, qualified candidates and completed franchise awards. Branch longevity, new branch announcements and renewals do not supply the missing recruitment conversion denominator.
  • Next territories: Yes, 3/3. The BFA profile identifies a specific Edinburgh-area resale, while the official process maps exclusive areas from postcode information. These provide actionable territory mechanisms beyond an unqualified national recruitment invitation.
  • Consistent recruitment without founder-driven conversations: Yes, 4/4. Katie is explicitly named as Business Development Manager and provides direct ownership contact and call booking. This establishes recruitment conversations beyond the founder, although final award authority is not inferred from that title.
05 Amplify Strong16/20

Amplify: Local branch pages, acquisition training and branch-level technology support customer development. The current owner roster requires reconciliation, and a complete continuing local marketing plan is less explicitly evidenced than initial launch support.

  • Local customer acquisition support: Yes, 5/5. Training covers lead generation, sales and local promotion, and the package supplies local web assets. Owner accounts of attending events corroborate practical acquisition activity beyond an abstract marketing promise.
  • Every owner represented online: Partially, 2/4. The branch finder and inspected Derby page provide local customer and carer contact routes. The opportunity’s stated branch count differs from the linked directory footprint, preventing complete reconciliation of every current owner’s representation.
  • Continuing local marketing plan: Partially, 2/4. Ongoing support and local business development are described, and an older article references an action plan. A complete current post-launch marketing calendar, assigned responsibilities and review intervals were not verified publicly.
  • Individual owner enquiry and performance tracking: Yes, 3/3. The technology supplier describes customer queries, booking management and revenue reporting at branch and headquarters levels. This supports individual customer and performance tracking, with supplier-reported delivery distinguished from an independent private-system audit.
  • Customers beyond personal networks: Yes, 4/4. Local pages, event promotion and public customer and carer enquiry forms can reach unfamiliar households. The franchise has acquisition routes beyond personal contacts, referrals or founder introductions, although suitable carer capacity remains essential.
73/100 Overall Five Fibre score

Five Fibre score: 73/100. Assess 13/20, Build 18.5/20, Launch 16.5/20, Grow 9/20, Amplify 16/20.

Assessment band: Growth Ready.

PetStay has a specific UK management proposition with evidence of operating owners, documented support and local customer journeys. Its commercial model connects three groups: the branch owner, households needing boarding and carers with suitable availability. Growth requires that those relationships work together. More customer enquiries do not create revenue if suitable carers are unavailable for the requested dates, and adding carers does not help if their location or household circumstances do not match demand. The most useful assessment therefore considers acquisition, matching, repeat booking and retained branch income together rather than treating the network as a simple pet-sitting business.

The history is reasonably clear. PetStay describes beginning in 2005 and franchising in 2012, while Companies House records the incorporation of PetStay Ltd in July 2012. These are different milestones and should remain separate. The January 2026 BFA account of Chris and Mark identifies two branches operated by the same ownership team over a decade. That is credible evidence of continuity and replication, but also demonstrates why branches cannot automatically be counted as unique franchisees. The existing factual columns have been preserved while the assessment records those distinctions.

The current scale figures need reconciliation before reuse. The recruitment page says there are twenty-five UK branches, whereas the inspected branch directory contains twenty-eight distinct linked branch labels. Some operators manage more than one area, and local page labels can combine several towns. The evidence therefore does not justify declaring twenty-eight independent franchisees or silently replacing the headline count. A dated roster should identify active owners, branch businesses, territories and pages separately. The public directory remains useful for local customer discovery even while that population question is unresolved.

Pricing also requires a current, dated package. The official opportunity prominently advertises a Spring 2026 offer and separately gives a £6,995 plus VAT franchise amount. The BFA profile matches that headline, while older QFA and brand article material use £9,995 plus VAT. These figures should not be combined into an undated investment range or treated as proof that the seasonal promotion remains contractually available in November. The page also mentions an initial management-fee holiday, making it particularly important to disclose the charge that follows. A candidate needs the complete continuing obligation and working-capital requirement, not only the discounted payment at entry.

The selected earnings claims need a defined accounting basis. The opportunity refers to amounts some owners earn in a month and a particularly high single month, but does not provide a representative cohort, consistent period or sufficient explanation of costs. The QFA profile uses turnover language in relation to carer numbers, which is not necessarily equivalent. A useful financial disclosure should explain the income retained by the branch after recurring fees, marketing, insurance, administration and other relevant expenses. Seasonal peaks should be separated from a realistic full-year outcome, and the owner’s personal boarding activity should not be mixed with management income without explanation.

The customer terms and the inspected Derby page clarify an important payment distinction. The arrangement fee belongs to the booking and matching service, while the carer’s allowance is a separate payment. The full advertised boarding price is therefore not automatically branch revenue or owner profit. Those documents also explain the continuing work behind the arrangement fee, including administration and support. This is commercially useful because the owner’s service does not end when a booking is made. Enquiries, matching, introductory meetings, changes and difficulties during a stay can all consume capacity that needs to be reflected in the model.

Build is supported by more than general assurances. The official package explicitly includes an operating manual, and the induction has a defined head-office element. External training detail covers practical areas of running the branch. The technology supplier, 6B, also publishes a case study describing integrated management functionality and branch-level financial visibility. That is relevant supplier-reported evidence of delivery, not an independent assessment of private software quality, security or universal adoption. The public material does not fully establish that manuals, marketing assets and every training resource are accessible through the same environment, so complete central resource access remains partial.

The technology evidence should also remain correctly attributed. Search results include a similarly named PetStay Connect product, but no sufficient link was established to treat its demo metrics or features as those of this franchise. The review relies instead on the brand’s own booking-system description, the identified supplier case study and the current BFA resale description. This avoids attributing unrelated software claims to owners. The commercial test is whether the actual branch system helps identify matching capacity, enquiry status, confirmed bookings and retained income, rather than whether a similarly named platform displays an attractive dashboard.

Launch provides a clear proposition and an accessible route to Katie as Business Development Manager. The form captures relevant background, postcode and enquiry source, while the stated process includes an initial call and virtual discussion. These are useful existing assets. The complete selection sequence remains less visible, particularly how candidates review financial assumptions, speak with comparable owners and validate their proposed local area before commitment. Making that process clear would strengthen decision quality without replacing the current website or simply increasing recruitment promotion.

Grow has a named contact beyond the founder and specific resale opportunities, but public pipeline measurement remains limited. Source capture earns credit, while monthly enquiry consistency, best-source performance and ownership conversion were not established. Those measures should be followed through to capable local operation rather than stopping at a signed agreement. New territory launches and resales also need different expectations. An established branch may bring carers and customers, but the continuing quality and suitability of those relationships should be checked rather than inferred from a historical database or an advertised income description.

Amplify has tangible foundations in local pages, marketing training and branch-level systems. The next improvement is to link demand generation to available carers and booking outcomes, including enquiries that cannot be fulfilled. A branch might need more suitable carers rather than more households, or better matching rather than a broader geographical footprint. Recording those reasons would help owners spend their time and marketing budget more effectively. A continuing local plan should connect customer and carer acquisition, seasonal demand, repeat booking and retained commercial value. That would also create stronger evidence for future candidates than isolated monthly earnings or a general claim of unlimited potential.

  • Grow: Follow applicant sources through suitability, acceptance and sustainable trading, distinguishing new launches from resales.
  • Assess: Reconcile current pricing, continuing charges and earnings definitions, separating branch arrangement income from carer payments and optional personal boarding.
  • Amplify: Connect customer demand, carer availability and unfulfilled enquiries to a continuing local acquisition and retention plan.
  • Launch: Clarify the complete discovery and validation sequence and replace ambiguous seasonal promotion dates with current terms.
  • Build: Confirm which owner resources and reporting functions are available in the actual central system and monitor their practical use.

Benchmark

How this network compares.

Overall, against the whole Index
This network73
UK Index average64
Overall, against Pet Services (19 networks)
This network73
Industry average62

Explore Pet Services in the UK Franchise Data Explorer

Keep your profile accurate

This profile is built from independently researched public information. If you represent this network, take the Five Fibre scorecard for it. We check your answers against our research before any score changes.

Update your Five Fibre scores

Something out of date?

Franchise information changes. If something on this profile is wrong or has changed, tell us and we’ll check it.

Tell us what’s changed

The Five Fibre Franchise Growth Scorecard

Want to assess your own network?

See where your franchise growth foundations are strong, where they are exposed and where growth may be getting blocked. Twenty five questions, around five minutes.

Take the scorecard