The UK Franchise Growth Index
Shoryu Ramen
Shoryu Ramen is a Japanese restaurant brand launched in the UK in 2012 by the team behind Japan Centre. Its official history identifies Tak Tokumine as founder and Hannah Tokumine as managing director. The brand's roots are connected to Hakata in Fukuoka, with the menu and hospitality intended to bring that regional food culture to UK diners.
The Five Fibre score measures this network against Twine Growth's Five Fibre Framework™ using the information available at the assessment date. It is not an endorsement, a financial recommendation or a recommendation to purchase a franchise.
About the network
More about Shoryu Ramen.
The signature product is Hakata tonkotsu ramen, made with a rich pork broth and thin, straight noodles. Executive chef Kanji Furukawa, who was raised in Hakata, developed the brand's recipe. The wider proposition includes Japanese street-food side dishes, sake and cocktails, combining a specialist food identity with a staffed restaurant and bar experience.
The official website lists restaurants in London areas including Regent Street, Soho, Carnaby, Covent Garden and Shoreditch, as well as Oxford and Manchester. These customer locations show the brand's trading presence but do not provide a current split between company-owned and franchised operations. A restaurant count should therefore not be used automatically as a count of franchisees.
Shoryu actively invites franchise partners for national and international development. Its recruitment material seeks people interested in Japanese food and drinks, service and the brand's long-term direction. Published benefits include comprehensive training, pre-opening support, assistance from the operations team and a marketing and promotional calendar.
The public franchise page does not set out a complete current investment range, royalty schedule, property specification or minimum multi-site commitment. Those details require a proposal for the relevant market and location. The operating responsibility involves delivering the restaurant's food and service standards with an appropriate team, while any claims about growth potential or financial performance should be assessed against site-specific costs and the actual franchise agreement.
At a glance
Shoryu Ramen at a glance.
- Industry
- Food and Drink
- Franchise category
- Restaurant
- Sub industry
- Casual Dining Restaurant
- Founded
- 2012
- Franchising started
- 2022
- Approximate locations
- 10
- Headquarters
- London
- BFA member
- No
- UK origin
- Yes
- International brand
- Yes
- Recruitment status
- Active
Investment
Franchise investment.
- Investment from
- £550,000
- Management franchise
- Yes
- Retail premises
- Yes
- Executive franchise
- Yes
- Master franchise available
- Yes
Investment figures change. Confirm current requirements directly with the franchise network before making any decision.
Five Fibre assessment
How the foundations score.
Every franchise network is assessed across the five connected areas Twine Growth believes support sustainable franchise growth.
How the Five Fibre score is calculated
Assess: A current franchise offer and documented UK ownership development substantiate the model. Turnover examples and expected revenue do not establish achieved representative owner profit.
- Profitable core business: Partially, 2.5/5. Actual restaurants and a documented UK franchise-development agreement substantiate implementation. Public turnover illustrations are not representative current net owner accounts.
- Operates without daily founder input: Yes, 5/5. A managing director, specialist teams and independent operating partners substantiate operation beyond daily original-founder delivery.
- Ideal owner defined: Yes, 3/3. Published recruitment identifies experienced hospitality operators with resources, team-building ability, service commitment and an appetite for multi-site development.
- Realistic owner earnings: Partially, 2/4. Directory material gives dated sales and expected revenue, but no current representative achieved net owner cohort. Revenue must not be presented as return on investment.
- Distinct proposition: Yes, 3/3. Hakata tonkotsu ramen, a defined hospitality experience and central production create a specific restaurant proposition.
Build: Published build and operating manuals, restaurant training and departmental opening support substantiate transferability. A complete single owner-resource destination remains partly verified.
- Documented operating playbook: Yes, 5/5. Published package material explicitly identifies build and operating manuals, with continuing updates.
- Structured onboarding: Yes, 4/4. Restaurant-based training followed by opening assistance connects preparation with practical service delivery.
- Documented brand experience: Yes, 4/4. Build standards, specified equipment, decor, tableware and customer-service preparation substantiate a documented common experience.
- Central resource access: Partially, 1.5/3. Manuals, EPOS and support functions are identified. A complete single maintained destination for every owner resource was not verified.
- Launch without constant founder input: Yes, 4/4. Operations, IT, marketing and supply-chain departments are described as involved in opening, reducing dependence on constant founder intervention.
Launch: The primary offer identifies suitable partners and a dedicated team contact. Detailed current financial screening and final acceptance are less public than the support package.
- Clear ownership proposition: Yes, 5/5. The primary page explicitly offers national and international franchising and describes the support proposition.
- Targeted recruitment messaging: Yes, 4/4. Messaging connects Japanese food and hospitality commitment with experienced operators and commercial resources in supporting recruitment material.
- Enquiry journey: Yes, 4/4. A dedicated franchise-team email and directory information routes provide identifiable ownership contact. No enquiry was sent.
- Pre-acceptance discovery: Partially, 2/4. Initial contact and support are described, but the complete current financial-validation, discovery and acceptance sequence was not verified.
- Recruitment launch plan: Yes, 3/3. A current primary offer, documented franchise-development activity and public recruitment presence substantiate a route to market.
Grow: Professional franchise development and site support exist. Suitable monthly applicants, recruitment source quality and ownership conversion were not verified.
- Consistent monthly ownership enquiries: No public verification, 0/5. No dated consecutive-month series of suitable ownership applicants was verified. Restaurant bookings concern customers.
- Enquiry sources and prospect quality: No public verification, 0/4. No ownership recruitment source-quality comparison was verified. National marketing and PR are not equivalent evidence.
- Enquiry-to-owner conversion: No public verification, 0/4. No dated ownership enquiry-to-agreement cohort was verified. A development agreement lacks the applicant denominator.
- Next locations or territories: Partially, 1.5/3. The offer identifies Greater London and wider UK development with site support. A current detailed priority schedule was not reconciled.
- Founder-independent recruitment: Yes, 4/4. A franchise-team contact, specialist departments and documented professional development support substantiate recruitment capacity beyond the original founder.
Amplify: A promotional calendar, local discovery, EPOS support and individual KPI reviews connect marketing with restaurant performance. Universal current independent-owner coverage remains partly verified.
- Local customer acquisition support: Yes, 5/5. The primary page explicitly identifies a promotional calendar, while package material describes national and local marketing and opening campaigns.
- Every owner represented online: Partially, 2/4. A public locations page and partner-information maintenance support local visibility. A definitive current independent-owner roster was not reconciled against every asset.
- Continuing local marketing plan: Yes, 4/4. Continuing promotional planning, branded materials and repeat-customer campaigns extend beyond opening.
- Individual enquiry and performance tracking: Yes, 3/3. Published support explicitly includes individual franchise KPI analysis, maintained EPOS and recurring audit or planning visits. This supports commercial tracking without independently auditing profit claims.
- Customers beyond personal networks: Yes, 4/4. Public booking, delivery, local discovery and promotional campaigns reach customers beyond an owner’s personal network.
Five Fibre score: 76/100. Assess 15.5/20, Build 18.5/20, Launch 18/20, Grow 5.5/20, Amplify 18/20.
Assessment band: Growth Ready.
Shoryu Ramen has a current explicit franchise offer supported by an established restaurant proposition. The brand connects Hakata tonkotsu ramen and Japanese hospitality with central production, supply and operational support. For an owner, the important commercial relationship is between the product system, a suitable restaurant site, trained staff and local repeat demand. A well-known menu or attractive dining environment does not by itself establish that the property and operating costs leave an acceptable return.
The primary franchise page invites partners and identifies training, operational assistance and a promotional calendar. Supporting directory material adds considerable detail about manuals, departmental support and the intended operator. A dated 2022 announcement identifies a first UK franchise-development arrangement and planned openings. That announcement demonstrates a contractual development step at that time, not automatic completion of every restaurant in the plan. The current public location estate also should not be counted as one independent franchisee per restaurant.
Assess recognises a specific customer proposition, a defined owner profile and professional operating infrastructure. Financial claims remain partial. The directory includes a weekly-turnover example explicitly dated to 2021 and an expected revenue figure after two years. Those are not current achieved net earnings. The related news article also uses return-on-investment language alongside a comparison of revenue and investment. Revenue divided by startup capital is not a valid measure of the owner’s realised investment return, because it ignores operating costs, financing, working capital and timing.
A useful financial assessment would therefore start with recent actual restaurant results and the proposed site. Central preparation may simplify aspects of in-store work, but supply pricing, labour, rent, service mix and sales capacity still need to be modelled. The owner needs to understand which activities remain local and which are provided centrally, and how those obligations affect margin. Neither a broad market opportunity nor a high projected sales level can replace that relationship between operating workload and retained income.
Build has clear published substance in build and operating manuals, practical training and opening assistance. The described involvement of operations, IT, marketing and supply-chain teams connects different dependencies of a restaurant launch. Continuing manual updates and visits also support consistency after opening. The central-resource answer remains partial because the existence of several systems and support teams does not establish one complete maintained destination for every owner document, template and learning resource. This qualification does not negate the explicitly described manuals.
Launch is identifiable and directed towards a relevant audience. Supporting recruitment material describes the experience, funding access and team capability expected from partners. The primary page’s shorter invitation should be read alongside that context, while current commercial terms still need confirmation. The complete present screening and acceptance process is less public than the opening support. Publishing the stages of mutual discovery, financial review, site validation and agreement would help distinguish a serious qualified operator from someone attracted mainly by the food brand.
Grow has an organisational foundation but limited numerical public evidence. Dedicated contacts and professional development activity show that recruitment can involve people beyond the original founder. No monthly series of suitable applicants, source-quality analysis or enquiry-to-agreement cohort was verified. The consumer promotional calendar belongs to Amplify, not proof of a predictable owner pipeline. Development plans should also distinguish a new independent owner from another restaurant for an existing partner, because the qualification and support requirements differ.
Amplify is comparatively well evidenced through the primary marketing commitment and supporting detail about local campaigns, EPOS and individual KPI reviews. These connections can help an owner understand sales, performance and repeat business rather than simply count campaign activity. The public research did not reconcile every independent owner with the current set of local assets, so universal coverage remains partial. The useful commercial review links acquisition with restaurant capacity, service quality and contribution margin, especially where dining and delivery create different costs and customer expectations.
The practical priorities are:
1. Replace dated sales illustrations with current representative owner economics and clearly defined achieved results.
2. Keep revenue, profit and investment-return language separate across primary and directory material.
3. Publish the complete candidate screening, site-validation and mutual-acceptance sequence.
4. Track ownership applicants by source and monthly progression, distinguishing new partners from existing-partner development.
5. Connect the promotional calendar and individual KPI reviews with local capacity, customer retention and retained restaurant margin.
Benchmark
How this network compares.
Sources
Research sources.
Keep your profile accurate
This profile is built from independently researched public information. If you represent this network, take the Five Fibre scorecard for it. We check your answers against our research before any score changes.
Update your Five Fibre scoresSomething out of date?
Franchise information changes. If something on this profile is wrong or has changed, tell us and we’ll check it.
Tell us what’s changedThe Five Fibre Franchise Growth Scorecard
Want to assess your own network?
See where your franchise growth foundations are strong, where they are exposed and where growth may be getting blocked. Twenty five questions, around five minutes.