The UK Franchise Growth Index
Tasty Plaice
Tasty Plaice is a fish and chip business whose franchise page describes roots in a traditional high-street shop more than thirty years ago. Its later development includes shopping-centre food courts.
The Five Fibre score measures this network against Twine Growth's Five Fibre Framework™ using the information available at the assessment date. It is not an endorsement, a financial recommendation or a recommendation to purchase a franchise.
About the network
More about Tasty Plaice.
The company names Merry Hill and Meadowhall Sheffield as examples of its experience. These references illustrate the setting promoted, but should not be taken as a count of independently owned franchises.
The proposition centres on bringing the Tasty Plaice food offer to further locations. A food court gives customers several nearby options, making speed, product consistency and clear presentation relevant to daily trading.
Public recruitment information is brief and directs applicants to contact the business. It does not explain a complete training programme, premises specification or ongoing support package, so those elements remain to be established.
Prospective partners should request current investment figures and clarify site selection, equipment, food supply, staffing and franchise charges. Rent, service charges, opening hours and local customer demand will be important when assessing a proposed unit.
At a glance
Tasty Plaice at a glance.
- Industry
- Food and Drink
- Franchise category
- Food and Drink
- Sub industry
- Fish & Chips
- Founded
- 1990
- Franchising started
- 2026
- Approximate locations
- 3
- Headquarters
- Coventry
- BFA member
- No
- UK origin
- Yes
- Recruitment status
- Active
Investment
Franchise investment.
- Investment from
- £100,000 plus VAT
- Investment to
- £300,000
- Management franchise
- Yes
- Retail premises
- Yes
Investment figures change. Confirm current requirements directly with the franchise network before making any decision.
Five Fibre assessment
How the foundations score.
Every franchise network is assessed across the five connected areas Twine Growth believes support sustainable franchise growth.
How the Five Fibre score is calculated
Assess: Trading food outlets and a defined operator role exist, without verified independent-owner replication or net earnings.
- Profitable core business: Partially, 2.5/5. Primary and shopping-centre listings support trading, without independently verified representative core profitability.
- Operates without daily founder input: Partially, 2.5/5. Multiple company-operated locations show team delivery, without a named independent owner or founder-absence test.
- Ideal owner defined: Yes, 3/3. Indexed recruitment specifies leadership, people management, funds and practical owner-operator or management commitment.
- Realistic owner earnings: Partially, 2/4. Company-store revenue claims provide partial context, without representative achieved franchise-owner net-income cohorts.
- Distinct proposition: Yes, 3/3. The proposition combines fish and chips with a distinctive battered-chip offer and food-court experience.
Build: An indexed five-day management programme and practical support exist, without a complete verified playbook or resource environment.
- Documented operating playbook: Partially, 2.5/5. Operational systems and practical guidance are described, without a complete controlled franchise manual being verified.
- Structured onboarding: Yes, 4/4. Indexed recruitment specifies a five-day business-management course followed by practical completion training.
- Documented brand experience: Partially, 2/4. Food preparation and customer-service expectations exist, without complete documented brand standards being verified.
- Central resource access: No public verification, 0/3. No complete central owner knowledge environment was verified.
- Launch without constant founder input: Partially, 2/4. An experienced operating team is described, without fully verified independent current owner launch capacity.
Launch: A live primary invitation remains, with detailed package evidence indexed and complete discovery unverified.
- Clear ownership proposition: Partially, 2.5/5. A live primary invitation exists, but complete current investment and continuing terms were not verified.
- Targeted recruitment messaging: Yes, 4/4. Indexed recruitment specifies practical leadership, service and financial capability.
- Enquiry journey: Yes, 4/4. Primary franchise email provides a direct enquiry route.
- Pre-acceptance discovery: No public verification, 0/4. No complete mandatory pre-acceptance discovery sequence was verified.
- Recruitment launch plan: Yes, 3/3. Primary invitation and indexed directory recruitment establish a launched opportunity, despite the directory profile no longer being live.
Grow: Site-based expansion is promoted without verified ownership applicant or conversion cohorts.
- Consistent monthly ownership enquiries: Partially, 2.5/5. Promotion exists, without verified consistent monthly suitable-applicant volumes.
- Enquiry sources and prospect quality: No public verification, 0/4. No ownership source-quality comparison was verified.
- Enquiry-to-owner conversion: No public verification, 0/4. No enquiry-to-owner conversion cohort was verified.
- Next locations or territories: Partially, 1.5/3. Site selection and food-court experience provide context, without a prioritised current territory sequence.
- Founder-independent recruitment: No public verification, 0/4. No separate founder-independent recruitment function was established.
Amplify: Marketing support and food-court discovery help customer acquisition, with recurring owner plans and commercial tracking unverified.
- Local customer acquisition support: Yes, 5/5. Indexed recruitment explicitly includes marketing, opening and business-development support.
- Every owner represented online: Partially, 2/4. Outlet and shopping-centre discovery exist, without a verified current independent-owner profile network.
- Continuing local marketing plan: Partially, 2/4. Continuing help is described, without a complete recurring local campaign programme being verified.
- Individual enquiry and performance tracking: No public verification, 0/3. No complete individual franchise-owner enquiry and commercial-performance review was verified.
- Customers beyond personal networks: Yes, 4/4. Public food-court discovery and customer ordering routes extend beyond personal contacts.
Five Fibre score: 54/100. Assess 13/20, Build 10.5/20, Launch 13.5/20, Grow 4/20, Amplify 13/20.
Assessment band: Growth Gaps.
Tasty Plaice has a live fish-and-chip customer business and a primary franchise invitation, with shopping-centre operators separately corroborating trading locations. Indexed recruitment material describes a newly launched ownership programme and practical support. The assessment recognises operating history, separating company stores from independent franchisees and turnover from personal income. Detailed directory content remained indexed, but opening the profile returned a notice that it was no longer live. The review qualifies those claims, avoiding an assumption of complete current primary terms. Representative achieved franchise-owner profitability and a measured ownership recruitment pipeline were not publicly verified.
Assess has concrete customer context. The primary location page lists Merry Hill, Sedgley, Meadowhall and Crystal Peaks, while centre pages corroborate the brand at Meadowhall and Merry Hill. These references establish service locations, not their ownership structure. The indexed recruitment account describes company-operated trading and a first franchise launch, yet also mentions training alongside an existing franchisee. That inconsistency is not resolved by inventing a current owner. No named independent franchise business or thirty-day founder-absence test was verified. Candidate messaging nevertheless explains leadership, team management and the commitment needed to operate a food business, rather than implying that investment alone is sufficient to reproduce established store performance.
The financial evidence is narrower than the operational history. Indexed recruitment distinguishes minimum funds from a larger total investment range that varies with location and size. Company-store turnover claims do not establish representative franchise net income after food, staff, premises and continuing charges. No achieved franchise-owner income cohort was verified. Shopping-centre visibility provides access to customers but also involves location-specific commitments and competition. A candidate needs a current quotation and realistic assumptions about serving capacity, opening hours and operating costs before translating an established store's annual sales into the return available from a different unit. The review does not treat a long trading history as proof that every proposed location is commercially suitable.
Build has an indexed management course followed by practical completion training, alongside described help with food preparation, staffing and operations. This supports structured preparation without proving a complete controlled operating manual, central owner knowledge environment or documented brand-experience system. An experienced team is described, while fully independent current launch delivery was not verified. Training alongside an existing franchisee needs clarification against the same profile's first-programme language. The practical transfer must connect product quality, preparation speed and staff organisation. Familiarity with a menu does not establish that a new operator can maintain service during busy food-court periods or resolve issues without repeated founder assistance.
Launch retains a live primary invitation and direct franchise email even though the detailed directory campaign is no longer live. The indexed candidate profile is specific, but complete current terms and a mandatory mutual-assessment sequence were not verified. Grow has site-selection support and food-court experience without a prioritised current opening sequence or verified monthly suitable-applicant volumes. Source-quality comparisons and enquiry-to-owner conversion cohorts also remain unverified. More sites should follow a demonstrated ability to support suitable operators and viable units. Neither footfall at existing centres nor the existence of a first franchise campaign establishes that every interested candidate has an appropriate location, funding or operational capability.
Amplify has described opening and marketing assistance, supported by public customer discovery through the brand and shopping centres. These channels extend beyond personal contacts while universal independent-owner profiles, a complete recurring local plan and individual acquisition-to-contribution review were not verified. In a shared food environment, marketing works with presentation, queues, service speed and repeat choice. More attention can create poor outcomes if preparation or staffing cannot sustain the demand. Sustainable local growth therefore needs sales mix, waste and contribution to inform promotion rather than measuring success only by customer numbers or assuming that presence within a busy centre guarantees sufficient profitable trade.
Assess priority: reconcile company stores, independent owners and training references. Provide achieved economics separating sales, food, staffing, premises, working capital and owner remuneration from company-store turnover claims and historic investment ranges.
Build priority: connect management and practical preparation with assessed readiness. Document food consistency, staffing, service and escalation responsibilities so new operators can sustain busy periods without routine dependence on informal founder support.
Launch priority: publish a complete current primary package and mutual-assessment sequence. Clarify investment, ongoing charges, premises requirements and available support, distinguishing indexed directory content from terms applicants can currently verify.
Grow priority: measure suitable ownership enquiries through assessment and supported opening. Prioritise sites using viable customer demand, practical unit economics, operator capability and support capacity rather than centre footfall or candidate interest alone.
Amplify priority: connect local promotion and centre discovery with retained contribution. Review sales mix, staffing, waste and service quality alongside demand so new units create sustainable owner income and dependable customer experiences.
Benchmark
How this network compares.
Sources
Research sources.
6 public sources used for this profile
Keep your profile accurate
This profile is built from independently researched public information. If you represent this network, take the Five Fibre scorecard for it. We check your answers against our research before any score changes.
Update your Five Fibre scoresSomething out of date?
Franchise information changes. If something on this profile is wrong or has changed, tell us and we’ll check it.
Tell us what’s changedThe Five Fibre Franchise Growth Scorecard
Want to assess your own network?
See where your franchise growth foundations are strong, where they are exposed and where growth may be getting blocked. Twenty five questions, around five minutes.